Favorite profex program

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

Bobby Cox

Favorite profex program

Post by Bobby Cox »

Which of the Newman programs do you prefer?Do you use any of the factory setting?Buck Gramtham gets a great tone out of his,Which setting do you use?
Smiley Roberts
Posts: 4564
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Hendersonville,Tn. 37075

Post by Smiley Roberts »

My favorites,in order,are:
#14-Buddy,for normal playing
#122-St.Louis II,for ballads
#83-Mooney,for obvious reasons
#113-Dobro? " " "


------------------
<font face="monospace" size="3"><pre> ~ ~
©¿©
mm
-=sr€=-</pre></font>
Bobby Bowman
Posts: 2304
Joined: 30 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Cypress, Texas, USA, R.I.P.

Post by Bobby Bowman »

I use about 15, but of those I use St. Louis 3 and Long Echo the most. These two have been altered a little to suit my personal tastes.
BB

------------------
If you play 'em, play 'em good!
If you build 'em, build 'em good!

User avatar
Tim Harr
Posts: 2567
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Dunlap, Illinois

Post by Tim Harr »

Lloyd Green patches are nice

Hughey 1 and Hughey 2 are nice

Also, the Larry Sasser patches sound good.



------------------
Tim Harr
Image


alex frank
Posts: 27
Joined: 21 Jan 2000 1:01 am
Location: kokomo,in. usa

Post by alex frank »

Hi Tim, haven't talked to ya since the contest in indy.We wre the second band up I was playing the derby.
I like the hughy settings too and i probably use them the most eccept i rewrote them in to my user prog. and modified them some now that i have a hilton pedal.Alex
Greg Derksen
Posts: 435
Joined: 16 Aug 1999 12:01 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Post by Greg Derksen »

Bobby, I found all the settings extremely
muddy , however the Lloyd and John H. settings were probably the best, The ones
I made myself are quite close to my 400 in tone, The thing about the Profex 11 is their
always seems to be a sort of processed
quality about it, not really in a bad way,
just not quite as real sounding as an amp.
I still like it more than some of the other
processors out their, but man I don't even
look at the factory steel programs for myself. Just boomy and bassy, not clear and
articulate, which it can do . Experiment!
Greg
User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22147
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Jack Stoner »

Wow, thanks Greg. Finally someone who agrees with me on the Pfx II and the bassy Newman Settings. I had a Pfx II for a year and never got anything but Chalker type sounds out of it (Chalker is great but I don't like that basssy a sound). The Lemay mod really improves the Pfx II but it's still a Pfx II.

I have a Transtube Fex and it's what the Profex II should have been. Even the Newman settings sound better on it but they do not use the Analog preamp and would have to be modified so I did my own programs for the Transtube Fex and they sound much better

------------------
Franklin D-10
Fender Nashville Tele
A Country Musician


Greg Derksen
Posts: 435
Joined: 16 Aug 1999 12:01 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Post by Greg Derksen »

Jack, You might find this interesting, I tried the Boss VF1 with this used ProfexII
that I purchased, and found the ProfexII
sweeter in tone, the Boss to my ears was
just a tad hard sounding, but cleaner &
quieter than the Profex.
Most of the Steel Players I know for some
reason ,refuse to make their own settings
with the ProfexII, they like to see their
mentors name on the screen I guess. Greg